Friday, June 20, 2014

Outcomes Assessment FAQ & Examples and Bloom's Taxonomy

DAMMCQs: Appendix. C: MCQs and Bloom's Taxonomy

Image source - https://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/images/asmtprocess-planning.gif

Designing and Managing MCQs:

Appendix C: MCQs and Bloom's Taxonomy


Contents of This Chapter
  • C1 Bloom's Taxonomy
  • C2 Application of Bloom's Taxonomy to the design of MCQs


C1 Bloom's Taxonomy

Following the 1948 Convention of the American Psychological Association, B S Bloom took a lead in formulating a classification of "the goals of the educational process". Three "domains" of educational activities were identified. The first of these, named the Cognitive Domain, involves knowledge and the development of intellectual attitudes and skills. (The other domains are the Affective Domain and the Psychomotor Domain, and need not concern us here). Eventually, Bloom and his co-workers established a hierarchy of educational objectives, which is generally referred to as Bloom's Taxonomy, and which attempts to divide cognitive objectives into subdivisions ranging from the simplest behaviour to the most complex. It is important to realise that the divisions outlined above are not absolutes and that other systems or hierarchies have been devised. However, Bloom's taxonomy is easily understood and widely applied.

C1.1. Knowledge.

Knowledge is defined as the remembering of previously learned material. This may involve the recall of a wide range of material, from specific facts to complete theories, but all that is required is the bringing to mind of the appropriate information. Knowledge represents the lowest level of learning outcomes in the cognitive domain. Examples of learning objectives at this level are: know common terms, know specific facts, know methods and procedures, know basic concepts, know principles.

C.1.2. Comprehension.

Comprehension is defined as the ability to grasp the meaning of material. This may be shown by translating material from one form to another (words to numbers), by interpreting material (explaining or summarizing), and by estimating future trends (predicting consequences or effects). These learning outcomes go one step beyond the simple remembering of material, and represent the lowest level of understanding. Examples of learning objectives at this level are: understand facts and principles, interpret verbal material, interpret charts and graphs, translate verbal material to mathematical formulae, estimate the future consequences implied in data, justify methods and procedures.

C.1.3. Application.

Application refers to the ability to use learned material in new and concrete situations. This may include the application of such things as rules, methods, concepts, principles, laws, and theories. Learning outcomes in this area require a higher level of understanding than those under comprehension. Examples of learning objectives at this level are: apply concepts and principles to new situations, apply laws and theories to practical situations, solve mathematical problems, construct graphs and charts, demonstrate the correct usage of a method or procedure.

C.1.4. Analysis.

Analysis refers to the ability to break down material into its component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood. This may include the identification of parts, analysis of the relationship between parts, and recognition of the organizational principles involved. Learning outcomes here represent a higher intellectual level than comprehension and application because they require an understanding of both the content and the structural form of the material. Examples of learning objectives at this level are: recognize unstated assumptions, recognises logical fallacies in reasoning, distinguish between facts and inferences, evaluate the relevancy of data, analyse the organizational structure of a work (art, music, writing).

C.1.5. Synthesis.

Synthesis refers to the ability to put parts together to form a new whole. This may involve the production of a unique communication (theme or speech), a plan of operations (research proposal), or a set of abstract relations (scheme for classifying information). Learning outcomes in this area stress creative behaviours, with major emphasis on the formulation of new patterns or structure. Examples of learning objectives at this level are: write a well organized theme, gives a well organized speech writes a creative short story (or poem or music), propose a plan for an experiment, integrate learning from different areas into a plan for solving a problem, formulates a new scheme for classifying objects (or events, or ideas).

C.1.6. Evaluation.

Evaluation is concerned with the ability to judge the value of material (statement, novel, poem, research report) for a given purpose. The judgments are to be based on definite criteria. These may be internal criteria (organization) or external criteria (relevance to the purpose) and the student may determine the criteria or be given them. Learning outcomes in this area are highest in the cognitive hierarchy because they contain elements of all the other categories, plus conscious value judgments based on clearly defined criteria. Examples of learning objectives at this level are: judge the logical consistency of written material, judge the adequacy with which conclusions are supported by data, judge the value of a work (art, music, writing) by the use of internal criteria, judge the value of a work (art, music, writing) by use of external standards of excellence. There is a great deal of information on Bloom's taxonomy on the Web.  Some starting points are:
Return to Contents of this Chapter


C2 Application of Bloom's Taxonomy to the design of MCQs


C2.1 Level 1: Knowledge

At this level, one simply requires the recall of acquired knowledge. WARNING! A test at this level can easily become a "Trivial Pursuit" exercise! Example C2.1.1
Which one of the following persons is the author of "Das Kapital"?

 1. Mannheim
 2. Marx
 3. Weber
 4. Engels
 5. Michels
Note that the responses are internally consistent - they are all the names of Germans whose written work have been major contributions on social issues. Example C2.1.2
In the area of physical science, which one of the following definitions 
describes the term "polarization"?

 1. The separation of electric charges by friction.
 2. The ionization of atoms by high temperatures.
 3. The interference of sound waves in a closed chamber.
 4. The excitation of electrons by high frequency light.
 5. The vibration of transverse waves in a single plane.
Simple recall of the correct definition of polarization (#5) is required. Internal consistency and plausibility are maintained in that all responses are actual physical phenomena. Example C2.1.3
According to the microgenesis of perception concept, the threshold
 of awareness consists of a hierarchy of thresholds. Which one of the 
 sequences shown below is correct?

1.   Recognition thresholds > physiological thresholds > detection
 thresholds.
2.   Physiological thresholds > detection thresholds > recognition 
 thresholds.
3.   Physiological thresholds > recognition thresholds > detection 
 thresholds.
4.   Recognition thresholds > detection thresholds > physiological 
 thresholds.

In this example, nothing more is required than the recall of the order of certain pieces of related information. The correct answer is #2.

C2.2 Level 2. Comprehension

At this level, knowledge of facts, theories, procedures etc. is assumed, and one tests for understanding of this knowledge. Example C2.2.1
Which one of the following describes what takes place in the so-called 
  PREPARATION stage of the creative process, as applied to the solution
  of a particular problem?

 1. The problem is identified and defined.
 2. All available information about the 
     problem is collected.
 3. An attempt is made to see if the proposed
     solution to the problem is acceptable.
 4. The person goes through some experience
      leading to a general idea of how the problem 
      can be solved.
 5. The person sets the problem aside, and gets
      involved with some other unrelated activity.

In this question, the knowledge of the five stages of the creative process must be recalled (KNOWLEDGE), and one is tested for an understanding (COMPREHENSION) of the meaning of each term, in this case, "preparation". Note that this question violates the rule that the answer and distractors should all be of about the same length. It is difficult to get around this one here, so the text is edited so that each line is about the same length.

C2.3 Level 3: Application

In order to classify a question into this group, ask yourself if prior knowledge of the background to the question is assumed to be both known and understood, and whether one is merely expected to apply this knowledge and understanding. Calculations based on known formulae are good examples of this, as shown in the example below: Example C2.3.1
Which one of the following values approximates best to the
volume of a sphere with radius 5m?

 a. 2000m³
 b  1000m³
 c.  500m³
 d   250m³
 e.  125m³

In order to answer this question, the formula 4[pi]r³> /3 must be known (recall of knowledge) and the meaning of the various symbols in the formula understood (comprehension) in order to answer this question. The correct answer is #3. Example C2.3.2
Which one of the following memory systems does a piano-tuner
mainly use in his occupation?

 1. Echoic memory.
 2. Short-term memory.
 3. Long-term memory.
 4. Mono-auditory memory.
 5. None of the above.

This is clearly a case of testing for the application of previously acquired knowledge (the various memory systems), which is also understood, as the meaning of each term must be clear before the student can decide whether it is applicable to the given situation. The correct answer is #1. Note that students may not necessarily know what a piano- tuner is or does. Watch out for cultural bias! The next example is more difficult to classify: Example C2.3.3


You are the sole owner and manager of a small enterprise
employing 15 workers. One of these, Alfred, (who has been
working for you for the past year and has somewhat of a
history of absenteeism), arrives late for work one Wednesday
morning, noticeably intoxicated. Which one of the following
actions is the most appropriate in the circumstances?

     1. You terminate Alfred's employment on the spot, paying him
         the wages still due to him.
     2. You parade Alfred in front of the other workers, to teach them
         all a lesson.
     3. You give Alfred three weeks' wages in lieu of notice, and
         sack him.
     4. You wait until Alfred is sober, discuss his problem, and give
         him a final written warning, should it be required.
     5. You call Alfred's wife to take him home and warn her that this
         must not happen again.

Note that this this question is classified as APPLICATION as in order to answer it, the relevant labour legislation should be known and understood. One could made a case for it to have a higher classification such as EVALUATION, on the grounds that one is asked to evaluate which one of the proposed actions is the best in the circumstances, or ANALYSIS, on the grounds that in order to select the most appropriate answer, one should analyse the possible outcomesof each decision. For both these levels, one would expect a greater amount of information as to Alfred's situation, the relationship between Alfred and his co-workers, union involvement in the enterprise etc., and have a more sophisticated set of distractors. Here, option #4 is clearly the best both on legal and human terms. Note that the figure of speech "on the spot" may not be understood by second- language students. Use suitable language!

C2.4 Level 4: Analysis

Example C2.4.1
"The story is told of the famous German Organic Chemist
Auguste Kékulé who was struggling with the problem of how
the six carbon atoms of benzene were linked together. He was
getting nowhere with the problem, and one day fell asleep in
front of the fireplace while he was pondering on it. He
dreamt of molecules twisting and turning around like snakes.
Suddenly, one of the snakes swallowed its own tail and
rolled around like a hoop. Kékulé  woke up with a start, and
realized that his problem could be solved if the six carbon
atoms of benzene were attached to each other to form a ring.
Further work showed that this was entirely correct."

The above passage illustrates a particular phase of the
creative process. Which one is it?

     1. preparation
     2. incubation
     3. orientation
     4. illumination
     5. verification

In the above example, the student is expected to know and understand the five stages of the creative process, and to apply this knowledge to an important factual example of creative thinking (the elucidation of the chemical structure of the benzene molecule). The ability to analyse the data (i.e. the given text) in terms of each of the five stages is what is being tested. The correct answer, by the way, is #4. Example C2.4.2 (Assume the question below is asked in a philosophy test.)
Read carefully through the paragraph below, and decide which
of the options 1-5 is correct.

"The basic premise of pragmatism is that questions posed by
speculative metaphysical propositions can often be answered
by determining what the practical consequences of the
acceptance of a particular metaphysical proposition are in
this life. Practical consequences are taken as the criterion
for assessing the relevance of all statements or ideas about
truth, norm and hope."

     1.   The word "acceptance" should be replaced by "rejection".
     2.   The word "often" should be replaced by "only".
     3.   The word "speculative" should be replaced by "hypothetical".
     4.   The word "criterion" should be replaced by "measure".

This question requires prior knowledge of and understanding about the concept of pragmatism. The paragraph, seen in this light, contains one word which vitiates its validity, and the student is tested on his/her ability to analyze it to see whether it fits with the accepted definition of pragmatism. With this in mind, #2 is correct. Option #1 would degrade the paragraph further, while #3 and #4 would simply result in changing to acceptable synonyms. Note that this question does not address Level 6 (Evaluation), as one is not asked to pass a value judgement on the text. This must be considered as a very difficult question, and will obviously require a high level of reading skills. Bear in mind that there will be a significant time factor involved.


  Example C2.4.3
Look at the following table and indicate which countries'
statistics are being reported in rows A, B and C. 
GNP per capita 1991 ($ USA) Growth rate of GNP per capita p.a. 1980-91 Population growth rate 1980-91 Structures of total employment 1980-85 (percentages)
Agriculture Industry Services
A 500 2,5% 1,5% 51 20 29
B 1570 5,8% 1,6% 74 8 8
S.A. 2560 0,7% 2,5% 17 36 36
C 25110 1,7% 0,3% 6 32 32
Choose your answer from the following list of possible
answers:

     1.   A is South Korea; B is Kenya; C is Canada.
     2.   A is Sri Lanka; B is Germany; C is Thailand.
     3.   A is Sri Lanka; B is Thailand; C is Sweden.
     4.   A is Namibia; B is Portugal; C is Botswana.

In order to answer this question, students must be able to recall the relative economic rankings of various countries (KNOWLEDGE) and understand the basis for such a ranking (COMPREHENSION). They must be able to apply these concepts when information is supplied to them (APPLICATION), and they must be able to ANALYZE the given information in order to answer the question. Students did not like this question when they were faced with it in a class test, as their immediate reaction was that "it was impossible to remember the statistics for all the countries that were discussed in class and given to them in handouts". They were surprised when told that such detailed knowledge was in fact not expected of them, but that they were to examine the table and perform a ranking on the basis of concepts that they should have mastered. The correct answer is 3.

C2.5 Level 6: Evaluation

At this level, one is asked to pass judgement on, for example, the logical consistency of written material, the validity of experimental procedures or interpretation of data. Example C2.5.1
A student was asked the following question: "Briefly list
and explain the various stages of the creative process".

As an answer, this student wrote the following:

"The creative process is believed to take place in five
stages, in the following order: ORIENTATION, when the
problem must be identified and defined, PREPARATION, when
all the possible information about the problem is
collected, INCUBATION, when there is a period where no
solution seems in sight and the person is often busy with
other tasks, ILLUMINATION, when the person experiences
a general idea of how to arrive at a solution to the
problem, and finally VERIFICATION, when the person
determines whether the solution is the right one for the
problem."

How would you judge this student' s answer?

     1. EXCELLENT (all stages correct in the right order
          with clear and correct explanations)
     2. GOOD (all stages correct in the right order, but the
          explanations are not as clear as they should be).
     3. MEDIOCRE (one or two stages are missing OR the
          stages are in the wrong order, OR the explanations
          are not clear OR the explanations are irrelevant)
     4. UNACCEPTABLE (more than two stages are missing
          AND the order is incorrect AND the explanations
          are not clear AND/OR they are irrelevant)

In the above question, one is expected to make value judgment on the content
of the given text (KNOWLEDGE of the subject is required), the meaning of
the terminology used (COMPREHENSION of the subject matter), and its structure
(ANALYSIS of the answer for the right order of events. The correct answer
here is #1, but suitable modification of the putative student answer could
provide a small bank of questions with other correct answers

Example C2.5.2

Another example is the "Assertion/Reason" question, in which two statements
linked by "BECAUSE" have to be evaluated in the light of certain criteria:


Judge the sentence in italics according to the criteria
given below:

"The United States took part in the Gulf War against Iraq
BECAUSE of the lack of civil liberties imposed on the Kurds
by Saddam Hussein's regime."


     a.   The assertion and the reason are both correct, and the
            reason is valid.
     b.   The assertion and the reason are both correct, but the
            reason is invalid.
     c    The assertion is correct but the reason is incorrect.
     d.   The assertion is incorrect but the reason is correct.
     e.   Both the assertion and the reason are incorrect.

The correct answer is "b", since while it is true that the United States took part in the Gulf War, it is also true that the Kurds in Iraq did not (and still do not) enjoy an abundance of civil liberties, but the threat to the US's oil supply as a result of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait was a much more pertinent reason for the United States joining in the fray. A knowledge and understanding of Middle East politics is assumed. What is tested here is the ability to evaluate the between cause and effect in the sentence in terms of predefined criteria.

Link source - http://web.uct.ac.za/projects/cbe/mcqman/mcqappc.html



More links to assessment examples:

https://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/students/plan/method/exams-mchoice-scenario.php

https://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/students/plan/method/exams-mchoice.php



FAQ on Outcomes Assessment
Source of PDF below is -
https://www.utexas.edu/provost/planning/assessment/iapa/resources/pdfs/Outcomes%20Assessment%20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions.pdf







Powerpoint Presentation about Outcome-based Education
Source - http://bit.ly/1w1reW3

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Psychology First Profession to Offer Outcome-based Board Exam in the Philippines

(photo source - http://prc.gov.ph/)
Dr. Imelda Virgina G. Villar, Board Member of the Board of Psychology of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) in her presentation at the Orientation for the Psychology Licensure Exam
Psychology held on 18 June 2014 informed a full packed PSSC Auditorium that Psychology will be the first profession to offer Outcome-based Board Exam in the Philippines. Aside from the Board Licensure Examination for Psychologists and Psychometricians (BLEPP) being implemented this coming October for the first time is another milestone in the history of Psychology in the Philippines.

Dr. Villar presented the TOS for both exams. She also discussed The New Taxonomy (photo below) I marked it as framing questions since I am not so familiar about this. So I did some research and read
some stuff about it. Check below to know more about outcome based education and this new taxonomy. As you will notice in the TOS per subject/course there's the outcome,  weight and number of items (each item is equivalent to 1%). She emphasized that the lesser the test item (lower percentage) means it has to do with retrieval/recall of information (basic of the cognitive system), and test with more items and of higher percentage means more challenging and complex.

Outcome-based education is all about competence - not only knowing information and theories but being capable to apply those knowledge and information into particular situations and circumstances. So the board exam is not only multiple choice of factual information and theories but more of the practical applications of those information, data and theories in particular cases and situations. Wherein a single situation/case scenario  may have 4-6 questions that should be answered. Level 6 - self thinking system in the taxonomy is the highest gauge in measuring level of competency.

So in a way we are also correct to label that the framing of question will be such as well.









Dr. Mirriam P.Cue, the Chairman of the Board of Psychology of PRC discussed about the importance of using an outcome-based licensured board exam. Her anecdote was that of the story of her husband who employs topnotchers to their engineering firm but are not able to deal and address properly issues and concerns that would crops up simply because they know things and facts but may not necessarily know how to do and apply those information and facts they learned.

She also made mentioned during her talk that their basis on matters of ethics - is the Code of Ethics for Philippine Psychologist. So at least there's a clue on those "ethicas/ethical"outcomes.

She also mentioned on the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) Memorandum Order 46 s2012, called “Policy Standard to Enhance Quality Assurance in Philippine Higher Education through an Outcomes-Based and Typology-Based QA,”  so the emphasis on the outcame-based examination.

Also in line with the ASEAN economic integration next year (2015) where there will be free movements of goods, capitals and professionals the outcome-based approach is also seen as a way to be at par with Philippines ASEAN counterpart in particular that of complying with the standards being set for the ASEAN Qualification Reference Framework in order to utilize the Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) to benefit Filipino professionals who could now work in countries where Philippines can enter into MRA.


The highlight of the forum was the question and answer portion. Below are some of the questions raised and answered:

1) How many hours allotted for the exam?
Ans - 2 hours per subject and 2 subjects per day, format will be multiple choice
(Program of the examination is still being finalized which will inform which subject will be scheduled for each day)

2) Which DSM will be used?
Ans - DSM 4-TR and DSM 5, but for Psychometrician it will be the basic (good to know both), plus ICD-10 (Chapter 5)

3) Will there be consultation in Visayas and Mindanao?
Ans - Schools in the regions can invite the speakers and provide provisions for their travel.

4) Which review center is accredited?
Ans - Dr. Villar - not encouraging to avail services of the review centers instead she encourage to attend review conducted in school. For Dr. Cue it is the prerogative of individual to do review at review centers or school. Dr. Hechanova stressed that PAP is not and will not endorse any review center.

5)  Where will be the venue?
Ans - It will be in Manila. But those in the regions with more than 50 examinees,  different schools may file their collective request for a regional exam to their PRC regional director who will submit the request to PRC Manila for consideration,

6) How many times can the board be taken?
Ans - Law is silent about it, so as many times.

7) Any recommended text books?
Ans - Different schools have their own textbooks so no recommended textbooks.


Audio recording of the presentations made by Dr. Villar and Dr. Cue is available for download with the link below.The two files are in  MP3 format and could be played with Windows Media Player/Goom/and other MP3 Players

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B9L6cSSvjzAoS1U4cEhwV1VZcFU&usp=sharing

Part 1 - 16.7 MB - 18 mins playtime (download takes about 4 mins)
Part 2 - 95.3 MB - 1:43 mins playtime (download takes about 8 mins)


Dr. Cue wishes all test takers to join the Oath Taking on Dec 9, 2014. Board results are expected to be out in 10 working days after the exam. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related read


Outcomes-Based Education

http://www.mb.com.ph/outcomes-based-education/
So the outcome-based education has metamorphosed into Outcomes-Based Quality Assurance and later, Outcome-Based Teaching Learning (OBTL) which starts with clearly stating, not what the teacher is going to teach, but what the outcome of that teaching should be, what the learner is supposed to do and at what standard.  In the offing is the Outcomes-Based Teacher Education Curriculum (OBTEC) being pioneered by the National Center for Teacher Education, the Philippine Normal University, to produce innovative teachers, competent educational leaders, and proficient research scholars.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outcome-based_education
Methods of outcome-based education (OBE) are student-centered learning methods that focus on empirically measuring student performance (the "outcome"). OBE contrasts with traditional education, which primarily focuses on the resources that are available to the student, which are called inputs. While OBE implementations often incorporate a host of many progressive pedagogical models and ideas, such as reform mathematics, block scheduling, project-based learning and whole language reading, OBE in itself does not specify or require any particular style of teaching or learning. Instead, it requires the students to demonstrate the skills and course content that they are required to learn. However in practice, OBE generally promotes curricula and assessment based on constructivist methods and discourages traditional education approaches based on direct instruction of facts and standard methods.

Each independent education agency specifies its own outcomes and its own methods of measuring student achievement according to those outcomes. The results of these measurements can be used for different purposes. For example, one agency may use the information to determine how well the overall education system is performing, and another may use its assessments to determine whether an individual student has learned required material.

Outcomes
The emphasis in an OBE education system is on measured outcomes rather than "inputs," such as how many hours students spend in class, or what textbooks are provided. Outcomes may include a range of skills and knowledge, reduction of youth unemployment , return-on-investment. Generally, outcomes are expected to be concretely measurable, that is, "Student can run 50 meters in less than one minute" instead of "Student enjoys physical education class." A complete system of outcomes for a subject area normally includes everything from mere recitation of fact ("Students will name three tragedies written by Shakespeare") to complex analysis and interpretation ("Student will analyze the social context of a Shakespearean tragedy in an essay"). Writing appropriate and measurable outcomes can be very difficult, and the choice of specific outcomes is often a source of local controversies.

Each educational agency is responsible for setting its own outcomes. Under the OBE model, education agencies may specify any outcome (skills and knowledge), but not inputs (field trips, arrangement of the school day, teaching styles). Some popular models of outcomes include the National Science Education Standards and the NCTM's Principles and Standards for School Mathematics[dubious – discuss], as well as European Union's Rethinking Education.


http://tomasinoweb.org/2013/features/outcomes-based-education-onwards-the-future.tw
 As the term implies, the OBE focuses more on the outcomes of learning.
     While the focus before is more on the inputs of the teaching-learning process—aiming on teachers, their facilities and their resources, among others—the OBE focuses on the outputs of learning instead. Examples are competencies acquired and developed by students and how these things become concrete and measurable to be applied in the future.
     In planning the learning experiences of the students under OBE, teachers now create their class syllabi with the end in mind.

New Taxonomy

http://thekglawyerblog.com/ptblog/articles/from-bloom-to-marzano-a-new-taxonomy-of-educational-objectives-for-plt/

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://maine.gov/doe/cbp/taxonomieslearning.html


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQfjV4akEFcgFwFDqv4voyZuWNY7oA6-BiJ72vOh2_4jRgGzWAt


https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRCczm-7Hew0ojxaudDl-dJZiuf05JvMXWu_LYzg-ZnBGXTYSsj


Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Code of Ethics for Philippine Psychologists included in the licensure exam

image link - http://clinpsyc.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Ethics.jpg


In the Orientation on the Psychology Licensure Exam that was hosted by PAP this morning, Dr. Cue, the Chair of the Board of Psychology of PRC made mentioned that the basis for their questions on matters pertaining to ethics on the ethical outcomes of the TOS will be the PAP  Code of Ethics posted below. So this document should be part of our review. 



 link source - http://www.pap.org.ph/includes/view/default/uploads/code_of_ethics_pdf.pdf

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Infographics - An Evolution of Mental Illness Treatment


An evolution of mental illness treatment

The infographics is silent about the use of DSM in diagnosing mental illness - so the prescription of psychoactive drugs. So much developments that took place in the 20th century that were not reflected in the infographics. Perhaps a separate one? Still a very nice presentation on the history of the treatment of mental illness.



Source - http://dailyinfographic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/msr-evolution-mental-illness-treatment-640x3295.png

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Unang Taong Anibersaryo ng ating Blog


image source - http://www.qandun.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/HappyAnniversary.175114211_large.jpg


Maligayang Anibersaryo sa ating Blog, sa mga bloggers natin at lalo na sa mga nagbabasa nitong ating blog! 
(Happy Anniversary to our Blog, to our bloggers and most especially to our readers!)

Sinimulan ang blog na ito dahil sa kakulangan ng mga impormasyon ukol sa Psychometrician Licensure Exam na noong nakaraang taon (2013) ay may mga balita na ipapatupad ito. Subalit malaking pasalamat ng lahat at hindi natuloy, nalungkot din syempre ang ilan na nag-review tapos maghihintay pa pala sila ng isang taon. 


Ilang araw at buwan din naming sinubaybayan ang mga websites ng CHED, PAP at PRC para sa mga announcements at makapigil hiningang paghihintay kung tuloy ba o di tuloy ang exam. Sa kalaunan lumabas din ang announcement na sa Oktubre 2014 na ito gagawin. 


Gayon din sa pagpasa ng mga requirements kailangan pang bisitahin ang PRC para malaman kung kailan pwedeng magpasa ng mga requirements para mag-board wala pa rin hanggang sa ngayon (as of writing)  mabasa sa webpage ng PRC at ng Board of Psychology ang ukol dito. Nadiskubre na lang natin nang  nakaraan na pwede na pala ang online application sa PRC subalit walang linaw pa noon kung kailan maaring magpasa at paano magpasa ng mga requirements - bagay na aming isusulat at i-blog kapag nagawa na namin. Kasalukuyang inihahanda pa namin ang mga kung anu-anong  mga requirements.


Kaya kung hindi ka handa ay malamang kung saan ka papapuntahin at ipapasa. Katulad na lang ng kwento ng isang kakilala na napapunta doon sa pagpapasahan ng requirements para sa nag-avail ng grandfather clause ng batas o RA 10029 - doon sa hindi kukuha ng board dahil sa matagal na nilang karanasan sa pag-practice ng psychology o bilang psychometrician (guidance counselors, teachers, psychometrician, etc). 


Paano naman ang mga nasa probinsiya malayo sa Manila, o kaya mga self-review lang at walang access sa mga impormasyon nakukuha tulad  ng mga nasa review centers. Kaya ito po ang naging dahilan natin para mag-blog - ang ibahagi sa inyo ang ilang mga ng kaalaman, impormasyon o update na nakukuha namin na napaka-dalang mabasa at makita offline man o online. 


Laking pasalamat din sa mga nagse-self-review at lumabas na ang Tables of Specificications (TOS). Ngayon mas alam na ang bagay na dapat aralin at i-review. Kung kaya't patuloy kami sa pag-aaral at pag-review para sa paggawa ng mga Review Guides at Quizzes.

Kaya sana po kasama din namin kayo na tumulong ipaalam ang ilang mahalagang mga impormasyon sa mga kapwa natin kukuha ng Licensure Exam para sa Psychometrician.


At sa ating unang taon,  nais nating ibahagi ang ilang infographics sa ibaba na  naabot na ng ating blog - mga statistics sa ating pageviews, traffic sources, posts, at iba pa. Kabilang ang posts na ito mayroong 109 posts na tayong nai-blog. May ibang buwan na masipag at naka-30 posts tayo, may buwan naman na 2 lang ang aming nai-post.


Pataas ang bilang ng nagbabasa ng blog. 
Hindi bumababa ng 500 ang pageview sa isang araw.


Pinakamaraming hits/pageviews ang post ukol sa 
Review Centers.


Syempre naman Pilipinas ang pinakamaraming 
mambabasa ng blog. Poland, hmmmm....


Marami gamit ang PC/laptop sa pagbabasa ng blog, subalit  pataas din ang bilang nang gamit ay ang kanilang tablet/smartphones at android ang OS.

  
I-google mo!
Google search ang pinagmumulan ng maraming 
traffic at pumapangalawa ang Facebook.



Kung gustong subaybayan ang ating mga blog posts at iba pang updates mangyari lang na idagdag kami sa mga sumusunod:









Job Descriptive Index


Job Descriptive Index (JDI) is a scale used widely in personnel psychology to measure five major factors associated with job satisfaction - the nature of the work itself, wages and salaries, attitudes towards supervisors, relations with co-workers, and opportunities for promotion. (Colman, A.M., Oxford Dictionary of Psychology)

Read more here - http://www.siop.org/tip/july10/06jdi.aspx

About the scales
For more than 50 years, the Job Descriptive Index and related scales have been continually developed and refined by the university’s noted Job Descriptive Index Research Group. Comprised of numerous faculty members and Ph.D. students, members of the research group have used their expertise in psychology, scientific research methods, and organizational behavior to study workplace attitudes and behaviors using these scales. To encourage the use of the scales, the scales are available for you to use free of charge. Products and services related to our scales are available for purchase, and proceeds help to fund efforts in the future.
  • The Job Descriptive Index is designed to measure employees' satisfaction with their jobs. The JDI is a “facet” measure of job satisfaction, meaning that participants are asked to think about specific facets of their job and rate their satisfaction with those specific facets. The JDI is comprised of five facets, including satisfaction with: coworkers, the work itself, pay, opportunities for promotion, and supervision.
  • The Job In General is also designed to measure employees’ satisfaction with their jobs. The JIG is a measure of global satisfaction, meaning that participants are asked to think about how satisfied they are with their job in a broad, overall sense.
  • The Abridged Job Descriptive Index and Abridged Job in General are shortened versions of the original scales. The abridged versions maintain adequate reliability, while reducing the administration time.
  • The Stress in General is designed to measure employees’ general level of workplace stress. Participants are asked to think about whether or not particular stress-related descriptors are characteristic of their job.
  • The Trust in Management is designed to measure employees’ feelings of trust toward senior management in their organization. Analysis of the scale revealed four factors (components) of trust: ability, benevolence, consistency, and integrity.
User’s Manuals, Automated Scoring Services, Norm-Referenced Scoring, and other services
It is strongly recommended that researchers and workplace professionals acquire the Quick Reference Guide prior to administering the JDI or other scales. These documents describe the development, validity, and reliability of the scales, as well as the proper administration, scoring, and interpretation of the scales. We offer solutions that can help you quickly recode your data for interpretation (automated scoring) and even compare scores from your sample to scores obtained from a large-scale, nationally-representative sample of United States workers (norm-referenced scoring).

Tuesday, June 10, 2014