Please vote for Psychometricpinas at the #bloggys2015

Please Visit: http://bloggys.ph/section-4/

Then, vote for: psychometricpinas.blogspot.com 

Vote for psychometricpinas for #bloggys2015 !

(until 31 October 2015 only)

Endorsements

http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/2015/10/international-endorsement-from-my.html

http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/2015/10/official-endorsement-from-spark.html

Campaign Collaterals

https://www.thinglink.com/scene/701458223898558464

Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and the Psychometrician

We have been receiving lots of queries about the requirements to renew license, to think that next month, in November 2015 would only be the first year anniversary of those who were licensed through examinations. To satisfy our inquirers and readers we made this blog post.

Of of the 57 regulated professions of  the Philippine Regulation Commission (PRC), 42 professions are required to earn 45 credit units while the rest are only required 30-credit units for them to renew their license. Check page 13 of the Revised Guidelines 2013-774 Revised Guidelines on the Continuing Professional Development  (CPD) below and look for item #35 for Psychologist (45 Credit Units), however it was not explicit if the same units apply to Psychometricians.

The following points were summarized and serve as highlights of the guidelines:

CPE to CPD

What used to be Continuing Professional Education (CPE) requirement for renewing PRC license is now called Continuing Professional Development or CPD. Continuing Professional Development or CPD is the inculcation of advanced knowledge, skills, and ethical values in a post-licensure specialized or in an inter- or multi-disciplinary field of study for assimilation into professional practice, self-directed research and/or lifelong learning.

Creation of CPDC

The resolution requires every professional regulatory board (PRB) to create a Continuing Professional Development Council (CPDC), subject to approval by the Commission.  The council is vested with powers and functions to ensure and set CPD program; evaluate the application and accreditation of CPD programs, providers,  self-directed and/or lifelong learning; monitor the implementation CPD providers; and assess annually and upgrade criteria for accreditation of providers and programs; conduct researches, studies and benchmarking for international alignment; issue operational guidelines; and perform other incidental or related functions. The Council will be composed of a chairperson and two members, subject to certain qualifications and limitations.

CPD Programs in Various Modes 

Aside from the usual or traditional way of earning CPD units through seminars, workshops, training and conferences the resolution allows for other modes to grant credit which include:

Self Directed Learning - on-line trainings, local/international seminars/non-degree courses, institution/company-sponsored training programs, and the like which did not undergo CPD accreditation but may be applied for and awarded CPD units by the respective CPD Councils.

Lifelong Learning - all learning activities undertaken throughout life for the development of competencies and qualifications. (Section 20: Maximum creditable units for self-directed and/or lifelong learning -  A maximum of 15 creditable units (CUs) may be credited for self-directed and/or lifelong learning within the compliance period of three (3) years.  Any excess CUs earned shall not be carried over to the next 3-year period.) 

Authorship - creation of a new idea/work such as technical or professional books, instructional materials, and the like.

Invention/Patent - a technical solution to a problem in any field of human activity which is new, involves an inventive step and is industrially applicable.  (Section 20. Inventions shall be given full credit units for the compliance period.

Post-graduate Academic Studies - master's or doctoral units/degree earned from a school, college or university, or other institutions recognized by pertinent government bodies.

Specialty Training - a non-degree post-graduate training such as residency, externship, specialty and sub-specialty program conducted, or fellowship conferred, by an organization or society, and/or recognized by the pertinent government authority. (Section 19. Any excess credit units shall not be carried over to the next 3-year period, except credit units earned for doctoral and master's degrees or specialty trainings which shall only be credited once during the compliance period.) 

Resource person - a lecturer, speaker, presenter, panelist, reactor, analyst in a specialized field or the like in a seminar or similar activity.

Diploma Program - a program offered by an institution of higher learning which requires a baccalaureate or post-baccalaureate degree for admission.

Professorial Chair - an academic position awarded to a member of a faculty at the tertiary level who has distinguished himself/herself in the field of expertise. 

Application and Accreditation of CPD Providers

CPD Provider is a natural or juridical person that conducts CPD programs accredited by the CPD Council to conduct CPD programs. An individual and/or   firm/partnership/corporation  may apply as  for accreditation as CPD Provider, provided that requirements and qualifications are satisfied. The accreditation will be valid for three (3) years and renewable for another three years only if  the provider is in good standing based on their performance and compliance of the Council's set standards.

Resolution No. 2013-774 (Series of 2013) - Revised Guidelines on the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Program for all registered and licensed professionals (with Annexes)

RES CPD RevisedGuidelines 2013-774 Revised Guidelines on the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Prog... by TinoRepaso

RES CPD Revised Guidelines 2013-774 Revised Guidelines on the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Prog...

LINKS of ANNEXES (all these annexes are also part/included in the above guidelines)

CPD FORM NO. 01 - Application for Accreditation as CPD PROVIDER

CPD FORM NO. 02 - Application Form for Accreditation of CPD Program

CPD FORM NO. 03 - Application for Crediting of Self-Directed and/or Lifelong Learning

CPD FORM NO. 04 - Monitoring Report

CPD FORM NO. 05 - Completion Report on CPD Program

CPD FORM NO. 06 - Affidavit of Undertaking

RPm Ethical Dilemma: Trabahong Walang Integridad

(photo credit - https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqiLicQ9ICkeZ53d7MATRP2d16VcTRB9Odv5cAQIOFNFD7Q0kZJkh5XyK2DcmMxuDMl2t3W8yo5yiby9yPXSfDnqAtlDxzrMLV6KhvfCoAVRheRrTaxqoBEcqu0hQOwuesZ1UJd-EohBJw/s640/WP_001423.jpg)

(Ed-We are featuring here a story we received from an anonymous sender and we hope to hear also from others, brave enough to tell their own same stories so that this issue would soon be addressed. We also would like to call the attention of the Psychological Association of the Philippines as the Accredited Professional Organization to look into this issue. The PRB of Psychology and the Department of Health as a government institution should also uphold and implement the law (RA10029). Given the licensure exam and professionalization of Psychometrician this anomalous and unethical practice among testing centers and OFW clinics should be stopped. Let us also offer solution and alternatives. Let's protect the integrity of our profession. Let's uphold the ethical practice of Psychometricians.)

Isa akong psychometrician sa isang clinic at nakakalungkot mang sabihin pero hindi ko nagagampanan ang trabaho ko na may integridad. Hindi ko man masasabi ang lahat pero gusto ko lang malaman ng mga may experience na sa larangan ng Sikolohiya at sa mga nakakataas ang mga problema ko sa aking trabaho.

Kung susumahin, may higit isang taon na akong experience bilang isang psychometrician sa 2 clinic sa Metro Manila. Nung una’y, napansin ko na OK ang trabahong ito dahil related sa akin kurso, nang tumagal-tagal na ako sa trabaho, nakikita at napapansin kong hindi na maganda ang trabahong ito (pasensya na) dahil sa aking napansin na hindi na tugma ang trabaho ko sa ethic na natutunan ko sa kolehiyo at sa pag-review para sa board exam – ang kadahilanan kung bakit ako nag-resign sa una kong pinagtratrabahuhan.

Nakapasa ako sa board exam para sa psychometrician at alam kong may malaki akong responsibilidad (kahit hindi ako psychometrician) hindi lang dahil may batas na akong dapat sundin, kundi na rin may pakialam ako sa ikabubuti ng mga tao sa tulong ng psychology.

Nag-apply ako sa iba’t-ibang institution, kolehiyo, at clinic sa Manila. Isa lang ang napansin ko, hindi pa tuluyang naipapatupad ng maayos ang ating batas (R.A. 10029). Marami pa ring gumagamit ng psychological tests na photocopied, may mga gumagamit pa rin ng projective tests na hindi naman angkop sa mga naga-administer nito, may mga gumagamit pa rin ng objective tests na hindi naman standardized sa Pilipinas (kasama ako rito at 100% akong sigurado na lahat ng nagtratrabaho bilang psychometrician ngayon ay hindi gumagamit ng standardized tests), at may ilan pa ring “walang pakialam” sa issue na ito.

Walong buwan na akong psychometrician sa ikalawa kong pinapasukan at kung ano napansin ko dati, ganoon pa rin ang sitwasyon sa ngayon. Labag sa loob ko ang gawin ang mga bagay na hindi tugma sa ating ethics at sa ating batas pero kailangan kong magtrabaho para sa sarili ko at magkaroon ng experience. Nung unang 2 buwan ko dito, kabadong-kabado ako dahil ganoon pa rin ang sitwasyon, nakakalito dahil hindi ko alam kung alin ang dapat mong sundin: ang batas at ethics ba ng mga psychometrician o ang batas at ang standard procedure ng DOH na hindi tugma sa una?

Siguro maraming magagalit sa artikulong ito at magsasabi na “Ang tanga mo naman, malamang ‘yung batas at ethics ng psychometrician, PAP, PRC, etc.”. Nasabi ko na rin ‘yan sa sarili ko pero wala eh. Mahirap siyang i-apply sa totoong buhay, sa realidad ng trabaho ko...

Hahawak ka ng 15 bilang ng kliyente araw-araw at bibigyan mo sila ng minimum battery ng DOH (1 intelligence test at 1 personality inventory kasama ang talambuhuhay, atbp.). Sa tingin mo ba makakuha ka ng sapat na impormasyon gamit lang ng battery na ‘yon sa taong pagbibigyan mo nito at ia-assess mo? Hindi. Sa artikulong ipapabasa ko sa inyo, malalaman ninyo ang reaksyon o sagot ng PAP sa DOH tungkol sa issue na ito noong taong 2010 pa. Kayo na ang mag-analyze o magbigay opinion sa artikulo na ‘yon.

Sa loob ng 8 buwan ko dito, hinayaan ko na lang ang issue dahil may “ganito-din-naman-ang-sitwasyon-ng-iba-mas-malala-pa-nga-yun-sa-kanila” mentality. Pero isang araw, may kaibigan ako na bago lang din sa trabahong ito, bagong psychometrician siya sa isang clinic at nagtatanong siya sa akin kung ano ang procedure ganyan-ganyan. Nung una, sinasabi ko na “hayaan mo lang ‘yung ganyan, wala naming mangyayari sa kliyente, i-base mo lang ‘yung resulta sa interview mo” pero napansin ko na ayaw kong mapasa yung mentality ko kaya siguro naging interesado ako na maayos ang trabaho ko.

Ang SOP sa clinic ng namin ay ganito, hindi ko alam kung parehas nung sa iba:

• Bigyan mo ng tig-isang test (intelligence at personality) ang kliyente.
• Ibabase mo ang katauhan niya sa nalakap mong data sa intelligence at personality at gagawan ito ng summary form mula sa DOH.

Ang ginagamit kong test ay: PNLT para sa intelligence at BPI para sa personality. Alam kong hindi ito standardized dahil ang pinagbabasehan pa ring norms ay ang nasa manual nito na gawa sa ibang bansa, at ang scoring nito ay hindi maliwanag at alam kong iba-iba sa bawat clinic.

May mga kaibigan din akong nagtratrabaho sa mga clinic at gumagamit sila ng DAPT at SSCT na alam kong hindi pwedeng gamitin lalo na kung hindi ka competent na gamitin ‘yun. Sa totoo lang, nagulat din ako nung nalaman kong ganun ang ginagamit nila. Tinanong ko siya, “Bakit ganiyan ang ginagamit niyo, naiinspect ba ‘yan?”. Sumagot siya, “Oo, na-inspect na kami ng DOH.” Nasa isip ko, nakalusot sila, makakalusot din siguro kami.

Alam ko na dapat matagal na akong natanggalan ng lisensya (kahit ayaw ko...ayaw ko talaga) pero sa ngayon, iniisip ko kung paano nagsimula ang ganito at kung ‘yung mga test ban a ginagamit ay standardized ba at paano nalikha yung summary form ng DOH na binase sa personality inventories (ibig sabihin Psychologist- nalaman ko ang pangalan kamakailan lang- o may alam sa paggawa ng test ang lumikha noon, ewan ko).

Gusto ko ding masunod ang artikulo ng PAP para hindi na ako kabahan sa mga gagawin ko. Siguro ilang taon pa ang lilipas para tuluyang maging maayos ang trabaho ng mga psychometrician dito sa bansa.

Salamat sa pagbabasa at kung may masama kayong sasabihin sa akin, gusto kong maranasan ninyo kung ano ba talaga ang trabaho ko para maintindihan niyo ako, okay lang sa akin na gawin kayong reliever for 1 week para mas maintindihan niyo ang sitwasyon ko at makapagpahinga rin ako. Itatago ko ang katauhan ko, at sa mga nakakaalam kung sino ako, sana maintindihan niyo rin ang pinagdadaanan ko at isainyo niyo na lang ang katauhan ko. Haha.

Salamat ulit.

By:  Xyfer

PAP Statement on AO 2010-0022

International Endorsement from MY PSYCHOLOGY

Malaysia's first Psychology educational website. MY Psychology is a channel started by a group of Psychology students who share Psychology knowledge by conducting investigations via multiple approaches through psychological lens to enable public to learn Psychology in easier ways, share Psychology with others and apply Psychology for a better life. Currently in collaboration with SG Psych Stuff.

We are so proud and happy for the international endorsement of  MY PSYCHOLOGY for our bid to the #bloggys2015.

------------------

Psychometrics is one of the branches under Psychology which mainly investigates and measures psychological variables of people by conducting, administering and analyzing Psychological quantitative tests. There is no doubt that demand for Psychometricians has been growing rapidly in various areas, ranging from mental healthcare department, school guidance and career testing,  to managing business industries.  

Philippine Psychometrician Reviewer has been one of the leading reference sites that serves as an information hub for aspiring Psychometricians in the Philippines. With their informational site, they have been providing help and assistance for those who would like to take a step further in taking the board licensure exam for  Psychometricians. Their selfless dedication and commitment in providing assistance and useful information is undoubtedly contributing to the growth of Psychometrician as profession  in the Philippines. 

As one of the collaborators, MY Psychology is here to congratulate Philippine Psychometrician Reviewer for being nominated for the #bloggys2015. Apart from showing our support  for them, we are here to call for actions among our Facebook  followers and Youtube audiences to give them your huge support and wish them all the best for realizing their team's vision. Together, we believe that we can work better for the Asia-Wide-Region on Psychology matters.

Please vote for psychometricpinas to the #bloggys2015
Vote here - http://bloggys.ph/section-4/ 

Gary 
Director of MY Psychology

[SHOUT OUT for Philippine Psychometrician Reviewer ]Psychometric is one of the branches under Psychology which mainly...
Posted by MY Psychology on Sunday, October 25, 2015

Official Endorsement from SPARK Psychology Review Center

SPARK Psychology Review Center

9 hrs · 

OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM SPARK

The blog http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com has been part of the ongoing history of the psychometrician profession in the Philippines. The blog has represented every wandering-wondering student who aspires to be a psychometrician. Their altruistic service is unmatched by even the highest institution that should represent the psychology field. THEY SERVED AS THE FRONTLINER AND HAVE ANSWERED A LOT OF INQUIRIES THAT SHOULD BE ANSWERED PRIMARILY BY PRC/PRB.

NOW IS THE TIME TO SHOW OUR SUPPORT FOR THE BLOG THAT DARED TO REPRESENT THE PSYCHOMETRICIAN FIELD. Please vote for psychometricpinas.blogspot.com in the Bloggys 2015 Blog Awards. To vote, simply visit http://bloggys.ph/section-4/. Deadline of voting is on October 31, 2015.

We at SPARK have always commended the efforts of the psychometricpinas team and we support their advocacy in providing selfless service, unbiased, independent, and factual information that the psychometrician field deserves. We call on the united efforts of the 67 thousand+ likers of SPARK FB page, including all our alumni and official students to join the cause.

At the end of the day, all of us will be part of a community of topnotch professionals.

Jason Go
Founder/Academic Coordinator
SPARK Review Center

OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM SPARKThe blog http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com has been part of the ongoing history of...
Posted by SPARK Psychology Review Center on Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Source - https://www.facebook.com/SparkReviewCenter/posts/859184007522148



The above statement is the official endorsement of SPARK Psychology Review Center for our blog for the #bloggys2015.

Mabuhay SPARK! 

Maraming salamat po sa inyong endorsement!