A blog resource and reviewer for aspiring Filipino Psychometricians, those preparing to take the Board Licensure Exam for Psychologists and Psychometricians (BLEPP). Visit our FB Page Philippine Psychometrician Reviewer at https://www.facebook.com/psychometricianreviewer
Friday, May 6, 2016
PRC Online Application for Examination
Watch these videos and read through the slide for your guide on the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) Online Application for Examination. Credit to PRC (https://www.prc-online.com/) and another author of the video - .
Anyone can now register or create their online account at PRC. It will be a requirement to sign-up and fill the online form before you can file for the application for examination.
For those asking when to apply for examination - as observed in the PRC calendar here - http://www.prc.gov.ph/page.aspx?id=3071 the Psychologist/Psychometrician schedule is not yet in orange (color) meaning the link for the application is not yet active. So continue to monitor that link to know if the link is already live only then can you apply.
For now, as of posting 6 May 2016 the link is not yet live so you can not apply ahead or early on - just wait for the #tamangpanahon.
For your other queries and concerns visit and read these links to familiarize yourself with #BLEPP2016:
Brochure on Psychometrician by PRC
http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/p/psychometrics-is-specialized-field-and.html
Madalas na Tanong (FAQ)
http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/p/faq-madalas-na-ta.html
RA 10029 - Philippine Psychology Act of 2009
http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/p/ra-10029-or-philippine-psychology-act.html
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
PAP Official Statement on the Nature, Purpose, and Utility of Psychological Evaluation Reports
(Note - this statement was issued by the Psychological Association of the Philippines (PAP) at the height of a controversy when an online news published to the public the result of psychological test of one of the presidential candidates for the 2016 May elections. This statement appeared and taken from this link: http://www.pap.org.ph/ and also posted at the FB page of PAP that appeared here - https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153386008415388&id=148851815387 )
April 22, 2016
Statement of the Psychological Association of the Philippines (PAP) on the Nature, Purpose, and Utility of Psychological Evaluation Reports
The Psychological Association of the Philippines (PAP) considers the recent reference of a psychological evaluation report regarding one of the candidates for the coming national elections as an opportunity for clarification about the nature and purpose of psychology as a scientific discipline and professional practice. Underlying this humanistic science and practice is a fundamental valuing of the inherent dignity and rights of each individual.
In giving this statement, the PAP wishes to explicitly declare its intention neither to endorse nor to oppose any specific political candidate. We believe in the individual's right and capacity to form his/her own opinions and political convictions based on his/her experiences and reason. This statement defends this right and is not intended to push for any particular political persuasion. It only wishes to clarify the nature, purpose, and utility of psychological practices, particularly the psychological evaluation report.
The PAP wishes to inform the public of the following:
Firstly, the PAP upholds the proper use of psychological evaluation results, ensuring that these are not utilized as a means of undermining the character of any person, private or public. The PAP Code of Ethics for Psychologists (PAP, 2009) lists as its first guiding principle the "Respect for the dignity of persons." In essence, any social science or profession engaged in human services aims to enhance the functioning and wellbeing of any person. The intentional misuse of information derived from such a service (i.e., psychological evaluation) is a clear violation of this principle. Using psychological evaluation reports for purposes other than their original intent fosters the stigmatization of people who try to gain access to mental health services and delivery of public health in general.
Secondly, the PAP upholds the individual's right for privacy and confidential communications. Psychological practice necessitates the careful and secure handling of records and documents concerning clients, including assessment reports. Psychological evaluations or assessments are done for various purposes and in different contexts (e.g., industry, medical, educational, forensic, etc.), and will focus on relevant information that fulfills the goals of the assessment within each given context. In the event that the psychological assessment report is to be submitted as part of the requirements for a legal procedure, such as, a court proceeding for the petition for the declaration of nullity of marriage, it then becomes a public document. However, this does not grant permission for anybody to use it for any purpose other than its original intent. Psychological assessments are designed and conducted based on the individual’s reason for undergoing one. Hence, results of the assessment primarily address this reason, and cannot simply and easily be generalized to the person’s other intentions and behaviors.
Thirdly, the PAP upholds the ethical practice of basing assessment decisions and recommendations on data and test results that are updated and relevant to the current purpose. Hence, we do not utilize outdated and possibly obsolete assessment results to describe and explain an individual’s current functioning. Assessments done several years back may be valid then but may not be completely reflective of the person’s present functioning. We acknowledge that certain aspects of psychological functioning remain stable over a long period of time, but subsequent interventions or life experiences may likewise affect many aspects of one's psychological functioning.
Lastly, the PAP would like to correct the common use of the term “psycho test” to refer to the process of psychological evaluations or assessment. This process often entails the use of various methods, and standardized psychological tests are just one of the methods often employed. The usage of the term is misleading in that it creates the impression that psychological tests are the only tools used in diagnosing mental illnesses and psychological disorders. The fact is mental health professionals (e.g., psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, etc.) are the ones who diagnose with the use of various assessment methods, not solely on the basis of results from psychological tests.
The PAP reiterates its mission to strengthen Philippine psychology's scientific base in support of a relevant and humanistic practice of its profession. We seek to enhance a greater understanding of psychological truths that enhance the wellbeing of each individual, regardless of race, gender, age, education, political convictions, etc. We pray that this statement brings to light the fundamental principles and good practices that guide the profession, which other professions and the general public can appreciate and respect.
Saturday, April 9, 2016
Madalas na Tanong sa BLEPP 2016
MADALAS NA MGA TANONG
FAQ for #BLEPP2016
1) When is date of 2016 BLEPP?
Examination date will be on August 30-31, 2016
2) When is the deadline of application?
Deadline of application is 10 August 2016
(Start of filing of application will be by July - check PRC website for announcement.)
3) Where will be the venues?
Luzon - Baguio, Manila, Lucena, Legaspi
Visayas - Cebu, Iloilo,
Mindanao - Cagayan de Oro, Davao,
4) I failed the last time I took the BLEPP can I take again?
Yes you can. Read our post regarding requirements for repeaters here -
5) What is the passing rate?
In section 18 of RA 10029. "Ratings in the Examination. - To be qualified as having passed the licensure examination for psychologists and psychometricians, a candidate must have obtained a weighted general average of at least seventy-five percent (75%) for all subjects, with no grade lower than sixty percent (60%) in any given subject. So, to be safe you must have a score of 75% or better for all subjects." Many of test takers are failing their Psychological Testing which is equivalent to 40%, so even if you get a high score in the three other subjects but below 60% in Psychological Testing then the rest of your high scores will be pulled down and so tendency of failing the licensure exam. So the safest is to at least get 75% in all the subjects and not lower.
6) What is conditional?
In Section 18 of RA 11029 "An examine who obtains a weighted general average of seventy-five percent (75%) or higher but obtains a rating below sixty percent (60%) in any given subject may retake such subjects within the next two (2) years, and upon obtaining a rating of at least seventy-five percent (75%) in each such subject, shall then be deemed to have passed the licensure examination." A case scenario would be an examinee who scored high on all three subjects but got 58% or 59% in Psychological testing, even if the examinee is high on the three subjects (say 90% in all 3 subjects) thus earning a passing mark but failed one of the subject then the examinee's case will be conditional. So he can retake again (and should pass) only the subject s/he failed.
7) I did not show up during the examination day for some unforeseen reason, am I considered a repeater?
Yes since you have been counted as an examinee for that particular day. So your application will be as a repeater since you already have your documents filed with PRC.
8) Any suggestion on how I should prepare for BLEPP?
Check the image below. If you have other questions and concerns try to use the search button of our blog and typed in keywords of your query. You may also leave your comments and also check our FB page or send us private message (PM) here - https://www.facebook.com/psychometricianreviewer/?ref=bookmarks
9) I have other questions not covered here, where will I find answers?
Check link here - http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/p/faq-madalas-na-ta.html
Friday, April 8, 2016
Why are Filipino Americans still forgotten and invisible? Seriously, why?
This is not
a rhetorical question, nor do I intend to provide potential answers to this
question in this article. I am seriously and genuinely asking: Why?
The reason I
am asking this question - yet again - is because of the New York Times’ (NYT)
most recent installment of their “Conversations on Race” Op-Doc series, where
we see “Asian Americans talk about how stereotypes unfairly confine them —
particularly the one that brands them a 'model minority’…(and how) this
perception not only devalues the experiences of other racial minorities, but it
also renders the diverse experiences of Asian Americans invisible.” The stories
shared also “went beyond personal accounts of racism and discrimination here in
the United States, and extended to the residual outcomes of American influence
in Asia, particularly as they relate to immigration…experiences (that) more
closely resembled those of Latinos and African Americans than any sort of ‘model
minority’ narrative.”
It sounds really good!
You see, I -
along with many other fellow Filipinos in the diaspora - feel so passionately
about these issues that we have devoted our careers to addressing them.
Destroying
Asian American stereotypes? Check. Studying Asian American experiences with
racism? Check. Challenging the model minority myth? Check. Understanding the
effects of American influence in Asia especially as this relates to
immigration? Check. Arguing that some Asian groups’ experiences closely
resemble those of Latinos and African Americans than any sort of “model
minority” narrative? Check. Illuminating the diverse experiences of Asian
Americans beyond the typical East Asian perspective (i.e., Chinese, Japanese,
Korean)? Check.
As for that
last one on the list about addressing the invisibility of other Asian American
groups beyond East Asians, I and many other folks have focused primarily on
having Filipino American experiences seen, heard, and included. Check. Check.
Check.
So I was
very excited about the documentary!
So I watched
it.
And it was
good.
The 7-minute
film is well-done. It touched on several important issues and concepts such as
colorism, speaking English with an accent, America’s influence in Asia,
immigration, the perpetual foreigner stereotype, why the model minority myth is
not true, and of course – many personal experiences with racism.
However, out
of the 12 participants whose stories were featured and shared, not one name
appeared to be Filipino.
After
watching the film, my immediate reaction was:
“Uhm, I
don’t think there was one Filipino on there. Wait, it’s 2016 right?! Weren't I
and many other folks complaining about this in the 90s? And weren’t prior
generations of Filipino Americans complaining about this marginalization before
us?”
The
“Forgotten Asian Americans” and the “Invisible Minorities”
This type of
marginalization isn’t unique. It's not new. The NYT documentary is not
exceptional in its disregard of Filipino American stories. It's just that the
NYT documentary reminded me of the painful reality that Filipinos have been
historically ignored and unappreciated, and how such marginalization still
happens to this day!
You see,
Filipino banishment goes back to the fact that there was a Philippine-American
War that lasted for 15 years and during which thousands – some say 1.4 million
– Filipinos were killed by Americans, but yet such a war seems to be
unacknowledged, hidden, and forgotten. Filipino marginalization goes back to
the days of the manong generation, whose struggles in the farms of Hawaii,
California, and Washington – as well as in the canneries of Alaska – continue
to be unknown to many. It goes back to how the hard work and leadership of
Larry Itliong, Philip Vera Cruz, and other Filipino farmworkers are
overshadowed by the celebrity of Cesar Chavez. It goes back to how President
Franklin Roosevelt pledged that Filipinos who fight for the United States
during World War II would be granted citizenship and military benefits - so
over 250,000 Filipinos heeded the call – but shortly after the war ended that
promise was taken back with the Recission Act of 1946. It goes back to the many
ways in which Filipino people have contributed to this country’s rise as a
global power, but the American masses remain oblivious to such historical and
contemporary reality.
These are
some of the reasons why respected Filipino American historian Fred Cordova
referred to Filipino Americans as the “Forgotten Asian Americans.”
This
marginalization is also reflected in my field of psychology – the field that
studies stereotypes, racism, and how they influence peoples' psychological
experiences and mental health. For example, a simple search on PsycINFO – the
largest database of psychology-related scholarly literature – produced 1783
articles, books, dissertations, and book chapters using the word “Filipino.” In
comparison, the term “Chinese” returned almost 49,000 hits. The term “Japanese”
returned over 34,000 hits. The term “Korean” returned almost 10,000 hits. The
term “South Asian” returned over 4000 hits. The search term “Asian Indian or
Pakistani or Afghan or Afghanistani” returned almost 2500 hits. Even a much
smaller Asian group than Filipinos - “Vietnamese” - produced over 2,000 hits.
And in last summer’s Asian American Psychological Association conference, there
was not one presentation or research project that was about Filipino Americans.
This is why
Filipino Americans have been regarded by psychologists as the “Invisible
Minorities.”
But it’s the
year 2016. Filipino American psychology has grown tremendously. We’ve also had
Filipino faces on the mainstream American stage over the past few years. As
examples, we have Manny Pacquiao, the Miss Universe is Filipina, Apl de Ap blew
up with the Black Eyed Peas and is still pretty famous, Jose Antonio Vargas seems
to be always on national TV, Filipino dancers dominate America’s Best Dance
Crew, and Doug Baldwin is a star wide receiver for the Seattle Seahawks who
made the Superbowl in 2014 and 2015. We even have Jordan Clarkson as the best
player for the Los Angeles Lakers – and yes, even better than today’s Kobe.
Filipinos
are definitely way more visible now! So what the heck?!?
The
Perplexing Marginalization of Filipinos
It’s
definitely discouraging to see that despite all the work and accomplishments of
Filipino people in the diaspora, Filipinos are still unseen, unheard, and
unknown. That all the work over the decades toward being recognized and valued
do not seem to be making any difference; that when people think of Asians, they
still don’t think of Filipinos. It’s quite disheartening to realize that
Filipinos are still the forgotten Asian Americans and the invisible minorities.
But despite
yet another punch in the face, we have to keep fighting – resilience is a
Filipino trait after all. So with the audacity to still hope that change can
happen, here are five reasons why it’s perplexing for Filipino Americans to be
continually ignored, forgotten, and marginalized.
1.
Uniqueness of Filipino American History
Filipinos
are the first Asians on U.S. soil, with documentation of shipwrecked Filipinos
who were slaves in Spanish ships landing on the shores of what is now Morro
Bay, California back in 1587 - long before the United States of America even
existed. Also, Filipinos are the only Asian group to be colonized by the U.S.,
and this colonial history has serious and widespread implications on identity,
racism, colorism, acculturation, and mental health. Research has shown that
such a colonial history has made the Filipino experience very similar to the Latino,
African American, and Native American experiences. Therefore, it just makes
sense that any project that was interested in Asian American experiences that
“more closely resembled those of Latinos and African Americans than any sort of
‘model minority’ narrative” to at least include the Filipino story.
2. Huge
Filipino American Population
Filipinos
are the second largest Asian American group, numbering around 3.5 million,
which is approximately 20% of the Asian American population. In other words, 1
out of 5 Asian Americans is Filipino. This is especially significant if we
remember that the Asian American community is very diverse – it is composed of
at least a dozen different ethnic groups! Filipinos are also the largest Asian
group in the state of California, which is the most populated state in the
country. Filipinos are also the largest Asian group in the states of Alaska,
Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Washington, Wyoming, and
South Dakota. So that’s 11 out of the 50 states, again approximately 20% of
America. Therefore, proportionally-speaking, whenever any project on the “Asian
American experience” is done and it involves at least five Asian Americans,
then at least one of the featured subjects should be Filipino in order to truly
demonstrate a strong commitment to represent the diverse voices of Asian
Americans.
3. Large
Immigrant Population
Filipinos
are currently the fourth largest immigrant group in the United States after
Mexicans, Chinese, and Asian Indians, as over 1.8 million Filipinos in the
United States are foreign-born. As recently as 2010, however, Filipinos were
the second largest immigrant group in the country after Mexicans. Also, Jose
Antonio Vargas – a Filipino man – is the public face of immigration reform. So
it’s surprising that a Filipino person wasn’t even included in a documentary
that touched on immigration. Combined with the fact the Filipinos are the only
Asian ethnic group to be colonized by the U.S., it should be an easy decision
to have the Filipino perspective be reflected by any project that explores the
“residual outcomes of American influence in Asia, particularly as they relate
to immigration.”
4.
Significant Contributions to “Asian American” Identity
Filipinos
were also instrumental in creating the “Asian American” umbrella term and
political identity during the 60s when the Asian American Political Alliance in
Berkeley was founded, when Asian Americans collaborated with Black, Chicano/a,
and Native American students in San Francisco State University and University
California Berkeley to demand ethnic studies courses, and when Asian American
students and community members advocated for Filipino residents of the
International Hotel in San Francisco. So Filipinos were a big part of the
creation of the “Asian American” political identity, giving Asian Americans
stronger mainstream visibility and political clout and influence. But despite
this, Filipinos continue to be marginalized and glossed over in many projects
about the "Asian American" experience.
5. Filipinos
Experience Racism at a Very High Rate
Filipinos
also experience racism at a very high rate, even compared to other Asians. A
recent study found that 99% of Filipino Americans experience racism on a
regular basis, and that these experiences lead to psychological distress, low
self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. Even further, Filipinos also report
commonly experiencing subtle forms of racism called microaggressions that are
unique from the microaggressions experienced by most other Asian Americans. For
instance, contrary to the “model minority” myth, Filipinos are often assumed to
have inferior status or intellect (e.g., Philippines-trained professionals are
treated as not being as good as others) and are often seen as deviant in some way
(e.g., being a gang member or a criminal), which are microaggressions that are
also commonly experienced by non-Asian American groups such as African
Americans, Latinas/os, and Native Americans.
The Struggle
Continues
Another
microaggression unique to Filipinos is that they report commonly experiencing
discrimination even from other Asian Americans. Also more recently, research
found that while 96%-98% of Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese individuals
identify as “Asian,” only 47% of Filipinos do. Perhaps this continued
marginalization even within the Asian American community is why many Filipinos
do not identify as Asian Americans. Sure, perhaps Filipinos just don’t feel
connected to other Asian people, cultures, and lived realities. But perhaps
Filipinos also don’t feel welcomed.
Perhaps
Filipinos still feel unheard, unseen, unknown, and unappreciated. Perhaps many
Filipinos don't want to identify with a group that seems to endlessly neglect
and ignore them.
So here we
are, in 2016, and we are still fighting the same fight. Despite our unique
history in the U.S., our large numbers, our significant contributions to the
Asian American community, and our unique struggles with racism, immigration,
health, and in other areas (e.g., education, income, etc.) that challenge the
“model minority myth”, we are still ignored and rendered irrelevant.
We are still
wanting to be seen, wanting to be heard, wanting to be included.
We’re still
perplexed. We’re still complaining.
So again,
why are Filipino Americans still “Forgotten” and “Invisible”? Seriously, why?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
E.J.R.
David, Ph.D. has two books, "Brown Skin, White Minds: Filipino American
Postcolonial Psychology" and "Internalized Oppression: The Psychology
of Marginalized Groups."
Follow the
author on Twitter: @ejrdavid
More
information about the author here
BE INSPIRED: MEET DR. E.J.R. DAVID, A PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENTIST
E.J.R. David, is currently an associate professor of Psychology, author of two books (Filipino - American /Postcolonial Psychology:
Oppression, Colonial Mentality, and Decolonization), Director of Alaska Native Community Advancement in Psychology (ANCAP) Program, and a Filipino American community activist. He is also a psychological scientist who
has published in scientific journals that concerns the topics in Filipino American psychology and mental health. He has been a
featured speaker on The Filipino Channel and other community on-line and print publications, as
well as on several television and
radio programs (see source). He received the Distinguished
Student Research Award "for his significant contribution in psychological
research related to ethnic minority populations" by American
Psychological Association Division 45. Dr. David was also honored by the
American Psychological Association Minority Fellowship Program in 2012 with the
Early Career Award in Research for Distinguished Contributions to the Field of
Racial and Ethnic Minority Psychology, citing his "outstanding scientific
contributions and the application of this knowledge toward the improved mental
and physical well-being of people of color (see source).
MORE OF HIM (Interview from www.filamako.com):
Please
tell us who you are.
What’s
up everybody, this is E.J. David, author of Filipino-/American
Postcolonial Psychology. I grew up in Pasay to Kapangpangan parents. I also
grew up in Paranaque and Las Piñas, while going to school in Don Bosco
Makati. When I was fourteen, I moved to Barrow, Alaska, which is the northern
most point in the United States. I played competitive high school basketball
and was an all state basketball player for two years. After that, I attended
the University of Alaska Anchorage to obtain my bachelors degree in psychology,
while working at a local mental health agency and also a roughneck in the oil fields
around Pluto Bay. Then I attended the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, where I received my Masters and Ph.D. in Clinical Community
Psychology. Now, I am a faculty member in the psychology department at the
University of Alaska Anchorage with my primary duties being with the doctoral
program and the students in the clinical community Ph.D. program.
What
inspired you to pursue a career in psychology?
None
of these were really planned. I was never really the type of student, who was
really into school when I was young. All I really cared about was basketball. I
had no intention of going to college and becoming a doctor or professor. All I
wanted was to eventually play in the Philippine Basketball Association (PBA),
which is like the NBA of the Philippines. I wanted to be a professional
basketball player. If I was going to college, it was so that I could play
college basketball. I didn’t care about school at all. When I was a sophomore
in high school I became really curious why people made fun of my Filipino
accent, the way I dressed, and my Filipino values and mannerisms. I also began
to ask myself, why I made fun of FOBs (Fresh Off the Boat). I questioned why I
regarded lighter skin as more attractive and many products in the U.S.A. as
better than anything from the Philippines. I also began to see that many
Filipinos and Filipino-Americans thought the same thing. Given that psychology
is the scientific study of human thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors, it gave me
hope that somehow read more...
***88888***
I happened to see the post of Dr. EJR. David on twitter which was retweeted by Asian American Psychological Association. The article was entitled, "Why are Filipino Americans Still Forgotten and Invisible?" and it was published in Psychology Today (here). Luckily, I was able to get the original article from him and it was published here! (click here to read)
Follow him on twitter: @ejrdavid
Be inspired! #Mahupsych #lovepsych #proudpsych
Thursday, March 10, 2016
Who are PRC's Recognized CPD Providers?
There are only 25 professions posted at the Philippine Regulation Commission (PRC) website with a list of recognized Continuing Professional Development (CPD) providers. As of writing the CPD Council for Psychologist and Psychometricians has not posted yet (perhaps not yet uploaded by PRC?) listing of recognized CPD providers.
Those who availed of the grandfather clause of RA 10029 - Psychology Act of 2009 will be renewing their license this year. Although Continuing Professional Education (CPE) was then issued before the switch to CPD. So their earned CPE points will still be used.
But for 2017, those pioneers RPm/RP or those who passed the BLEPP2014 might be required to show proof of CPD points they earned (unless there will be policy to still recognized CPE points). PAP came out of guidelines for those renewing their licenses for 2016 in February (last month). PAP also posted on their FB page their decision of not renewing CPE Provider applications or CPE single activity applications for this year (2016).
Given that PRB of Psychology has not come out with the list of its accredited CPD providers the list below from Social Work and Guidance and Counselors Councils might serve as an alternative councils for those interested to earn CPD points. However there's a need to clarify whether the Psychology Council would allow an RPm/RP to obtain CPD points from other professions. Will CPD points obtained from Social Work or Guidance and Counselor Councils or other councils for that matter be recognized by Psychology Council? Should you know any information about this matter we hope you can help clarify.
STANDARDS AND INSPECTION DIVISION
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD)
CPD COUNCIL FOR GUIDANCE AND COUNSELORS
LIST OF ACCREDITED PROVIDERS
AS OF JUNE 2015
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD)
CPD COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL WORKERS
LIST OF APPROVED PROVIDERS
AS OF 7/24/2015
References and Related Read:
http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/2015/10/continuing-professional-development-cpd.html
http://www.prc.gov.ph/page.aspx?id=3066
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153203787390388&id=148851815387
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153121314705388&id=148851815387
Sunday, January 17, 2016
Our Admins are Featured at The Ched Project
Bloggys 2015
First, it is very important to consider that a blogger’s post is CONSISTENT with original sources.
I try to communicate creativity by creating memes that are themed with puns. This, kind of approach is effective to catch our readers’ interest to read more about the ‘psych’ related subjects – making their learning experience lighter. – Admin Donnies
It should be reader-friendly.
On our blog, there are a lot of times that we use Filipino language as a medium and “trending” terms that our target audience will understand. We captivate them by adjusting ourselves to their level. Most of the time, we try to make some theories in Psychology and review materials as fun as possible and as simple as possible just to ensure that our audience in this field will relate to the topic.
No matter how passionate you are with your goals if the content of your blog isn’t simple enough in providing information, your target readers will look for other blogs of the same niche to help them better understand the topic. So as for me, the rule is just pretty simple, let your blog be reader-friendly or lose them. – Admin Riyan
Read more here - http://thechedproject.com/bloggingtipsfromwinners/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)