Friday, February 27, 2015

Sign-up for Regular Updates on the 2015 BLE4 Psychometrician






 



Industrial Psychology Practice Quiz on Team Dynamics

Try to answer the following Industrial Psychology practice quiz on Team Dynamics. We encourage you to discuss your answer in the comment section. 

We will provide answers to those who will sign-up in our survey. The purpose of the survey is to establish some baseline information about test takers this year (2015). So, should you want to participate, please provide an honest answer to make the data valid and reliable.  Click the link below:





Practice Quiz 

1) Described as group of people with different functional expertise working toward a common goal. They come from different departments or units of an organization formed to share information, come up with solutions and address, such team is called 

A.  Virtual team 
B.  Task force team
C.  Cross-functional team 
D.  Self-managed work team


2) From among the choices, which of the following does not describe an effective team   
A.  smooth interpersonal relationship
B.  some degree of resolvable conflict 
C.  a degree of social loafing
D.  concrete team goals


3) How many members are considered the most effective size for teams?

A. Up to 5 members
B. Up to 7 members
C. Up to 9 members
D. Up to 15 members


4) In order, what are stages of team formation goes through according to Tuckman?
A.  Norming, storming, forming, performing, adjourning
B.  Forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning
C.  Forming, staining, norming, performing, adjourning
D.  Founding, norming, storming, performing, adjourning


5) What is groupthink?
A. team pressure to think in a particular way   
B.  individual  compromise to fit within the group
C.  Group assembly to think and exchange ideas
D. Group solution by way of negotiation 


6) A group that is composed of individuals with voluntary membership status, having a low degree of authority, and requiring a high degree of management engagement is called 

A.  Quality circle 
B.  Virtual team
C.  Self-managed team
D.  Cross-functional team 


7) Magiliw Company  implemented team approach when it reorganized. Managers have now little involvement in directing the functioning of these teams that have some moderate authority to govern themselves with the most efficient and effective way they perform their  work.  The team is considered as 

A.  Advisory team 
B.  Cross-functional team
C. Self-managed work team
D.  Virtual team


8) One of characteristics of an effective team player that should not be on the list:
A.  collective leadership skills.
B.  good interpersonal skills.
C.  pursuit of self-initiative 
D. capacity to delegate and trust members


9) It is considered as the particular benefit of teamwork to the organization as a whole

A.  Higher and contagious motivation
B.  Skills and technical expertise are shared and transferred
C.  Sense of worth and fulfillment  
D.  Job enrichment
  

10) Who is considered as a Shaper in the Belbin Team Role

A.  Creative, imaginative, free-thinking, strength is of generating ideas and solving difficult problems
B.  Single-minded, self-starting, dedicated, reliable when it comes to providing  knowledge and skills 
C.  Challenging, dynamic, thrives on pressure, the driving force is courage to overcome obstacles
D.  Outgoing, enthusiastic, communicative, a networker who explores opportunities and other possibilities 


11. In the study of  Katzenbach and Smith (1993), what is the reason why it is difficult to achieve a high performance team 

A.  Turnover of high achievers who get promoted and transfered 
B.  People have their own individual goals to pusue 
C.  Different position in an organization prevents people to effectively perform in a team
D.  There is an involvement of higher levels of trust and commitment.


12. Recognizing the importance of team in your company which among the following should  not be included in recognizing team effort through monetary rewards?

A.  periodically assess or upgrade the system for rewards and compensation
B.  institutionalize a democratic system for members to develop rating system 
C.  allot time to reflect and execute changes in the reward system 
D.  devise an elaborate and complicated system for reward 


13. As a Quality Control Engineer you serve as the leader for a team composed of  members coming from your department, production, planning, and plant engineering. Your team can be considered as 

A.  self-managed work team
B.  problem-solving team
C.  task force
D. cross-functional team


14. Among the characteristics of an effective team are context, composition, work design and process. Identify which characteristic of a team that refers to presence of adequate resources, effective leadership, climate of trust, performance evaluation and reward.

A.  Process 
B.  Composition
C.  Work design
D.  Context


15. A team member that serves to coordinate and integrates the activities of team members.

A.  adviser 
B.  organizer
C.  linker 
D. maintainer


16. An important contribution of internet and communication technology is the ability of organizations to overcome boundaries and time and still achieve team goals.

A.  problem-solving teams
B.   task forces
C.  cross-functional teams
D.  virtual teams






Related Links :







Sunday, February 22, 2015

Updated Online Reviewer at Saylor Academy






UPDATED - 18 April 2016
(Original posting 2/22/2015)

As we have been preaching to those who are doing self-review,  with your internet access you can unlock a wealth of online resources for your review.

Saylor Academy whose mission is to enable you to fast-track your future with on-demand education as flexible as it is convenient provides different online courses. 

Listed below are Saylor's online courses in Psychology. These are some of the subjects of the upcoming Licensure Exam for Psychometrician.  

So maximize this opportunity. 

Let us know also online links you've found related to the board exam so we can share with others.

Check these links below. You might want to share your answers in the comment section. Will post in our next blog the links of the answers. Enjoy! 

Theories of Personality
http://saylordotorg.github.io/LegacyExams/PSYCH/PSYCH405/PSYCH405-FinalExam.html


I/O Psychology 
http://saylordotorg.github.io/LegacyExams/PSYCH/PSYCH304/PSYCH304-FinalExam.html

Introduction to Human Resources Management 
http://saylordotorg.github.io/LegacyExams/PSYCH/PSYCH304/PSYCH304-FinalExam.html



Abnormal Psychology
http://saylordotorg.github.io/LegacyExams/PSYCH/PSYCH401/PSYCH401-FinalExam.html


Clinical Psychology
http://saylordotorg.github.io/LegacyExams/PSYCH/PSYCH205/PSYCH205-FinalExam.html



Researach Method 
http://saylordotorg.github.io/LegacyExams/PSYCH/PSYCH202A/PSYCH202A-FinalExam.html





2/22/2015 = 3,164



Monday, February 16, 2015

Learningpod - Kaplan Practice Test on Psychology

Additional Learningpod quizzes courtesy of Kaplan Practice Test on Psychology. The quizzes includes Testing and Individual Differences, Personality, and Abnormal Psychology. Avail now before Learningpod closes next month. Just click the start practice button to go to the quiz link.

 

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Learningpod is closing, last chance to avail Kaplan Practice Tests on Psychology

AP Psychology Test is an examination taken by senior high school students in the US for them to earn credit so they do not have to take Introduction to Psychology subject when they enter college.

This Kaplan Practice Test is about General Psychology - all topics about Psychology. A good refresher to recall and review principles of Psychology. Take both test at different times. Try to review your answers especially those mistakes. 

Enjoy answering. Just click the links (Start Practice Test).

Got from my email this message - so Learningpod is also closing, too bad.


Learningpod will no longer be supported as of March 31st.
View this email in your browser
To our users,

Thank you very much for the support you’ve given us over these last two years. Sadly, despite our best efforts, we have not been able to figure out how to continue operations as a consumer service. That means we will no longer be able to support Learningpod.com, the Learningpod API, or the Learningpod Widget starting March 31st, 2015.

Our team has had the chance to work with some remarkable organizations and individuals, and it’s been a incredible joy for us to share great practice questions with so many. If you are currently relying on our questions to teach or study, please find instructions below on how to save your content or data as much as possible.
 

Monday, January 12, 2015

Review Centers Claim to Fame and Survey Result





The survey was posted here  with the following instruction - (ONLY FOR THOSE WHO REVIEWED VIA REVIEW CENTER.) The purpose of this survey is for us to learn the experiences of those who availed review for the Board Licensure Exam for Psychometrician offered by review centers. The result of the survey also aims to provide constructive feedback to these review centers for them to further improve their services. So we hope you can help answer this survey. Survey result and output will be shared in our blog. Please be assured that your identity and responses will be kept confidential. Survey will take about 4-5 minutes to answer.) Replies were gathered from the period of November 1-6, 2014.  There were 48 respondents. Below are the results/responses using Google Survey Analytics.


Gender
Female = 38
Male    = 10

Respondents'  Schools
  • Assumption College - Makati
  • Adamson University
  • CEU
  • Colegio de San Juan de Letran - Manila
  • Colegio de San Juan De Letran - Calamba
  • Dominican College San Juan
  • EAC- Manila
  • Eulogio "Amang" Rodriguez Institute of Science and Technology
  • Holy Angel University
  • Jesus Reigns Christian College
  • La Consolacion University of the Philippines
  • LPU-Batangas
  • LSPU
  • Lyceum of the Philippines University
  • Lyceum of the Philippines University Cavite Campus
  • Manila Central University
  • Manila Tytana Colleges
  • MSU-IIT
  • New Era University
  • Notre Dame of Dadiangas University
  • Pasig  Catholic College
  • PCU
  • Perpetual Help-Molino Campus
  • PUP
  • Saint Louis College
  • Saint Louis University
  • San Pedro College, Davao City
  • San Sebastian College-Recoletos de Cavite
  • Southern Luzon State University
  • Southville International School and Colleges
  • SPUQC
  • St. Theresa's College
  • St. Dominic College of Asia
  • Universidad De Manila
  • University of Caloocan City
  • University of the Assumption
  • University of the Cordilleras
  • University of the East - Manila
  • USANT
  • UST
  • Xavier  University




Review Centers

  • Assumption College 
  • Adamson University
  • Ateneo de Naga University
  • Carl Balita Review Center (2)
  • DELS in Cooperation with Pathways International
  • East West Psychology Review Academy (2) 
  • La Consolacion University Philippines
  • Mega Minds Review Center (3)
  • NCS
  • P & P Center
  • Pathways International Review Center (2)
  • Psi Psychological Testing and Research Services
  • Psy Review and Consultancy Center (2)
  • Review Center for Allied Professions (3)
  • SAGE Review Specialist (2)
  • SPARK Review Center (6)
  • SPC-ADDU Review Center
  • St. Louis Review Center
  • Sultan Review Group (2)
  • TRIAD Psychological and Testing Review Center (4)

  


Reviewees Recommendations 
The questions asked was - What can you recommend to improve the services of your review center? Primarily responses can be categorized into: review approach and methodology; handouts/materials; monitoring, punctuality and schedule;  costs and others.



Review Approach and Methodology

  • Not too long Examinations
  • Eliminate extraneous variables like noise due to building construction. Pre-exam held for only a day. Really toxic.
  • There should be at least two professor in each subject.. because there is an instance where the professor is having an emergency so we're forced to just leave because there's no one who gonna teach us.. because the owner and also the head professor needs to accompany that professor.
  • Review center should revise the program of the review.
  • Be more strict on the attendance.
  • Stress the importance of ToS. Have multiple rationalization and continuous feedback in the exam. Test checking should be done with precision and explanation of the answer.
  • More outcome based sample questions.
  • Change some of the resource person & distribute the review materials earlier.
  • Make the lectures more lively
  • There should be more lecturers and more time for reviewing
  • Create a team to ease the workload of the academic coordinator.
  • More set of practice questions to answer especially during weekends.
  • Provide the extra needs of the reviewees and the instructors should not be boring.
  • Longer time to prepare
  • Style of lecturing of instructors should be defined by expectations in review centers, not classroom setting. But it was understandable because the instructors didn't have experience in sitting in review centers.
  • Psychologist and Psychometrician should not be combine
  • Choose competent set of proctors and better lecturers with mastery of the subjects
  • Invite more knowledgable lecturers. They and the review center staff should also encourage their students more in doing better in the review sessions and in the actual licensure examination.
  • Use more questions and rationalization to learn more
  • More time for Psychological Assessment and More test to develop testing skills.





Handouts and Materials

  • More useful handouts and test taking techniques and practice.
  • Better handouts presentation, not merely printed powerpoint.
  • Give the review materials before the lecture start or at least right after
  • Provision of handouts(hard copy) which you can read at your own comfort instead of soft copies
  • Provide actual hard copy ng handouts, longer length of review, more time for subjects
  • I hope they will provide handouts and be prepared with ppts. Initially, they were not giving us our previous test papers for our reviewer materials but on the last few weeks, they gave us everything but without the answer key. They do not provide handouts. Before, apart from the fee, we also pay for photocopies of test paper. They also asked us for separate final coaching fee. Initially, we were almost 70 but at the end of the review, we were less than 20 because the other reviewees gave up beause of their system.
  • Uploading of lectures should be immediate or right after the discussion
  • Online ppts should be sent on time not 2 days before the exam (juice colored). 
  • Improve the print out materials and summary notes.
  • Double check the flashdrives some don't work




Cost

  • The cost of the review was very expensive. It costs 11,500 and another 3,000 for the final coaching. Worse, the expenses for the handouts was not covered by the large amount we paid. We had to pay them for the copies of reviewers. And the whole review was not even outcome-based!
  • Include handouts in the enrollment fee.
  • None. It's just that it's too expensive





Monitoring, Schedule and Punctuality  

  • Maybe it is better if we start on the right time, kasi meron yung mga weekends na ang schedule ay 8am pero nagsstart na ay 9am.
  • Whole weekend sana. both sat and sunday.
  • It will be more ok if there is frequent monitoring to the DLP by calling or doing internet phone call to check on progress




Others

  • Snacks and foods
  • Room space
  • Facilities, design, schedule
  • Provide White Board





Testimonials of Reviewees 



Not bad for a first time. Circumstances happened not in our favor are outside the center's control. But in the end, we were able to do what we need to do, e.g. final coaching.

Instructors are really good on their subject matter.  But there's this one instructor she's super fun but most of the time she's just telling stories and laughing.

Great! Very humble Review Director and Very helpful staffs. The professors are known  for  their respective field.

It was very beneficial.

One of the best.

The best!!

Please review with them.

The lessons should have been made concise, but still it was an okay experience because of the friendly staff and lecturers.

Supportive environment and great experience.

Indeed, it was a great privilege to part of the Team Triad. Having professors who are seasoned, passionate, and truly believing on what we can do challenges us to be the best we can be. Building the best in us means giving the best for us. God bless.

Great!! It is really informative and it really did give me new concepts and ideas.

Spark Review Center offers a wide variety of pedagogues to their students. From video presentation, analogies, practice test, study buddies, group works and many more. The review center molds its student to their fullest potential as a top notch Psychometrician or Psychologist  Filipino practicioner with integrity and work ethics.

The Best Review Environment

Approachable staff and trained instructors

I have a deep gratitude to our review center that whether I pass or fail they made a big help on my review.


Awesome!



Not so Satisfied Reviewees


The review center needs more reliable staff and lecturers

2nd Batch is inherently more cheap compare to the first batch. I noticed that no handouts were given and thus all ppt are in emails. You should be fortunate to have a printer at home to print it for free. Furthermore, I'd like them to make a rationalization of the answers per item. Or rather have the most difficult items be rationalized extensively. We are fortunate that the board were not so much tiring thus I should give the review center more ideas for improvement. -This statement is coming from a first batch having sit-ins in 2nd batch.

It did not really prepare me for Psych Assessment. no hard copy for handouts kasi puro lang powerpoint or kami mag sulat ng notes. Our lecturer in ab psych did not give her powerpoint or notes in ab psych kasi rumor has it that the lecturer is strict when it comes to distributing her powerpoint to others, which made reviewing abnormal psychology a struggle. 16 hours per subject was not enough, kasi siniksik yung mga topics in a short amount of time kaya yung retention eh hindi masyado mataas. Mabuti nalang maayos yung lecturer namin sa Industrial Psych at Theories of Personality kasi sila lang yung saving grace ng review namin.

Could be better.

If I were to make a testimonial, I will definitely not recommend this review center. Never.

It is a good review center but some lecturers are boring.







Related Links

http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/2015/01/good-and-least-performing-schools-of.html

http://psychometricpinas.blogspot.com/2014/11/official-result-from-prc-website.html

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.287826281427858.1073741834.139570119586809&type=3



Links to Facebook Posts of Review Centers

East West Psychology Review Academy
https://www.facebook.com/eastwestpsychologyreviewacademy/posts/1556970817851580
https://www.facebook.com/eastwestpsychologyreviewacademy/posts/1553511471530848

Megaminds
https://www.facebook.com/412728368826291/posts/686994248066367/
https://www.facebook.com/MegaMindsReviewCenter/posts/665452036887255


Pathways International
https://www.facebook.com/path.slacks/posts/1533173396941923
https://www.facebook.com/path.slacks/posts/1512486562343940


RCAP 
https://www.facebook.com/path.slacks/posts/1512486562343940
https://www.facebook.com/670086746382975/photos/a.670090123049304.1073741828.670086746382975/796194993772149/?type=1 


SPARK
https://www.facebook.com/SparkReviewCenter/posts/682012598572624

https://www.facebook.com/SparkReviewCenter/posts/681930438580840


Sultan Group 
https://www.facebook.com/sultanreviewgroup.psychreview/posts/1498025633797915
https://www.facebook.com/sultanreviewgroup.psychreview/posts/1498025607131251