refer to CHED Memorandum Order 38 Series of 2010 -
http://www.ched.gov.ph/chedwww/index.php/eng/content/download/1744/9056/file/CMO_38_s2010.pdf
Sikolohiyang Pilipino
Course Description
The course is a study of concepts and methods in the field of culture and psychology, giving meaning to psychological reality based on the language and world view of the Filipino. The students will be introduced to indigenous concepts in Sikolohiyang Pilipino, and its applications in various fields of psychology. They will also be trained in the use of indigenous research methods. Furthermore, issues regarding Sikolohiyang Pilipino as a discipline and as a movement will also be discussed. The course will be conducted in Filipino.
Suggested Course Content
- Indigenized Research Approaches (e.g. pakapa-kapa, pakiramdam, pakikisalamuha, pakikipagpalagayang loob)
- Indigenous concepts (e.g. kapwa, loob)
- Applications in various fields of Psychology
From the blog of John Hermes Untalan at
http://www.jh_untalan.blogspot.com/2004/07/sikolohiyang-pilipino-filipino.html provides the following
Sikolohiyang Pilipino (SIKOPIL) Syllabus
(Filipino Psychology)
3 units
Prerequisite : Introduction to Psychology
Magiging mahalaga sa pag-aaral ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino ang mgakatutubong konsepto sa Kapilipinuhan. Ang kulturang Pilipino angsiyang magiging daan sa pagtuklas ng mga kaalamang ito sapamamagitan ng paggamit ng wikang Pilipino. papaksain sa pag-aaral ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino ang mga metodong naangkop sapagtuklas ng mga kaalaman at kaisipang Pilipino.
Chapter I
Introduction: What is an Indigenous Psychology?
1. Difference with Cross-Cultural, Cultural, Ethnopsychology, and Volkerpsychology.
2. Global Indigenous Psychology
3. Basic Tenets and Principles in IP?
4. Types and Levels of Indigenization
5. Current Trends and Directions
Chapter II
Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Philippine Indigenous Psychology
1. What is Sikolohiyang Pilipino?
2. Basic Tenets and Principles in SP
3. Philippine Psychology and Psychology in the Philippines.
4. History of SIkolohiyang Pilipino
5. Fields in Sikolohiyang Pilipino (see Chapter VI: 5)
6. Sikolohiyang Pilipino and Philippine Social Sciences (Agham-tao; Pilipinolohiya at Pantayong Pananaw) [see clemen aquino]
Chapter III
Pagkataong Pilipino: Indigenous Filipino Personality
1. Enriquez' Filipino Personality Theory
2. IPC Filipino Personality
3. Salazar's Kaluluwa at Budhi
4. Covar's Bayang Dalumat at Pagkataong Pilipino
5. Alejo's Loob
6. Filipino Personality and Values in Theology (Manggay, Talisayon), Philosophy (Quito; Gripaldo), Literature (Lumbera)and Arts (others: Licuanan, Fernandez)
7. Filipino Trait and Personality Psychology by Church and Katigbak
8. Sta Maria's Filipino self
Chapter IV
Katutubong Panukat na Sikolohikal: Indigenous Personality Measurement
1. Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino by Carlota
2. Panukat ng Ugali at Pagkatao by Enriquez and Guanzon-Lapena
3. Locally-Developed Psychological Tests by Cipres-Ortega and Guanzon-Lapena
4. Discussions on new developed indigenous/local psychological tests
Chapter V
Katutubong Pamamaraan ng Pananaliksik: Indigenous Research Methods
1. Basic Tenets and Principles in an Indigenous Research Methods
2. Pakikiramdam: Isang Mahalagang Sangkap sa Pananaliksik (Mataragnon)
3. Enriquez and Santiago's Iskala ng Mananaliksik
4. Pakikipagkuwentuhan (Orteza; Javier)
5. Pagtatanung-tanong (Pe-Pua)
6. Ginabayang Talakayan (Galvez; Aguiling-Dalisay)
7. Pakikipanuluyan, Nakikiugaling Pagmamasid, Pakapa-kapa, Pagmumuni
Chapter VI
Fields in Filipino Psychology: Applied and Social Psychology
1. Filipino political psychology (montiel); social cognition (conaco); peace and conflict resolution (sta maria)
2. Filipino sexuality and gender; Filipino Feminism (claudio-estrada; tan; guerrero)
3. Filipino Psychotherapy (bautista; protacio-de castro; carandang; clemena)
4. Sikolohiyang Panlipunan-at-Kalinangan (salazar; sta maria)
5. Unang Dekada ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino (protacio-marcelino at pe-pua)
6. Filipino Social Psychology (gastardo-conaco) and pahiwatig (manggay)
7. new directions: volunteering (aguiling-dalisay, yacat, and navarro); developmental psychology (liwag)
Chapter VII
Closing Indigenous Psychologies
1. Critique in Sikolohiyang Pilipino and Indigenous Psychologies
2. Paper Presentations of Research and Reaction Papers
3. Seminar/Workshop in Sikolohiyang Pilipino
References in Sikolohiyang Pilipino
Joy B. Alvarez (1975) Hiya: kahulugan, manipestasyon at kadahilanan. In V.G. Enriquez(ed.)
Pagkataong Pilipino: I. Layunin, Ugali, Katangian at Pakikipagkapwa.
(pp. 115-126). QuezonCity: Department of Psychology, University of the Philippines.
Isidro Panlasigui (1977) Ang Sikolohiya ng mga Pilipino. In V.G. Enriquez (ed.)
Sikolohiyang Pilipino:Mga Piliping Papel (Serye ng mga Papel sa Pagkataong Pilipino), Paper No. 1 (August), 2-10. (Also as The Psychology of the Filipino People.) Far Eastern Economic Review (1956), 21(25),811-823.)
Nida R. Almonte & Abraham B. Velasco (1977) Ang Konseptong ng Disiplina ng mga Pilipino: IsangPanimulang Pag-aaral. In V.G. Enriquez (ed.) Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Mga Piliping Papel (Serye ng mgaPapel sa Pagkataong Pilipino), Paper No. 3 (October),23-47.
Indigenous personality measures: Philippine examples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
| January 01, 1998 | Guanzon-Lapena, Ma. Angeles; Church, A. Timothy; Carlota, Annadaisy J.; Katigbak,Marcia S. | Copyright
After noting the need for indigenous scale construction efforts in the Philippines, the current article focuses on the development and current status of two multidimensional measures of Filipino personality constructs, plus two projects that are investigating indigenous Filipino personality structure. In a final section, we note apparent convergences between the personality dimensions identified and assessed by these four projects and consider how these dimensions might relate to purported universal dimensions of personality (i.e., the "Big Five" dimensions).Reviews of the status of psychological measurement in the Philippines have highlighted two related problems: the questionable applicability of foreign-made tests and the dearth of locally developed tests (e.g., Bulatao & Guthrie, 1968; Carlota & Lazo, 1987; Church, 1987; Guanzon, 1985; Ramos,1977). Strong misgivings have been expressed about the relevance to Filipino behavior of the theories underlying foreign-made tests, and researchers and scientist-practitioners have been urged to develop indigenous tests. The restiveness of the Philippine academic community over the need for more culturally sensitive theorizing was reflected in the Sikolohiyang Pilipino (FilipinoPsychology) movement that began in the 1970s. Enriquez (1994) described Sikolohiyang Pilipino as rooted in its Malayo-Polynesian and Asian heritage, a psychology based on the experience, ideas,and orientation of the Filipino, with psychology defined on the basis of categories drawn from the Filipino language and culture. Local test development was thus welcomed as a cross-cultural indigenization effort in which culture is treated as source rather than target (Enriquez, 1979).Discussions of indigenous psychological concepts and research methods that have emerged as a result of the Sikolohiyang Pilipino movement can be found in a number of sources (e.g., Aganon &David, 1985; Enriquez, 1992; Pe-Pua, 1982).In a recent effort to document and organize existing work on psychological test development in the Philippines, both published and unpublished, Ortega and Guanzon-Lapena (1997) observed an upsurge in academic interest in the development of indigenous psychological measures. Whereas in the 1950s a mere handful of tests in educational psychology were locally developed, Ortega andGuanzon-Lapena's (1997) current listing includes more than 200 locally developed measures on a wide variety of Filipino characteristics, for example, katalinuhan (intelligence), pagkarelihiyoso(religiousness), kaasalang sekswal (sexual behavior), kakayahang magdala ng tensyon (ability tocope with stress), pagkamabahala (anxiety), kahustuhang emosyonal (emotional maturity),pakikipag-ugnayan (adjustment-maladjustment), Filipino management style, and gender sensitivity,to name a few.This article focuses on the development and current status of two multidimensional measures of Filipino personality constructs--the Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino (PPP; Carlota, 1985) and thePanukat ng Ugali at Pagkatao (PUP; Enriquez & Guanzon-Lapenia, 1997)--plus two projects that areinvestigating indigenous Filipino personality structure (Church, Reyes, Katigbak, & Grimm, 1997;Katigbak, Church, & Akamine, 1996). In a final section, we summarize hypothesized convergencesbetween the personality dimensions identified and assessed by the different approaches...
